Categories
Articles

Goodbye to Storrington

With the destruction of the Glebe field – at the heart of village life for hundreds of years – our village takes another step to suburbia. It is poignant to reflect on the loss of this lovely village in the name of progress. In light of Horsham District Council’s decision to bow to Diocese pressure, we appear to be losing sight of the things which make Sussex such a special place to live – the heritage, the landscape and the country ways.

SPANGLE members have been out and about in the past week chatting to villagers – both old and new. All have shared their disappointment with the development.

Those who bothered to look beyond the shiny images of the proposed surgery and the biased reporting of the West Sussex County Times, realised that this fight was not about healthcare (that was the smokescreen for building where we shouldn’t be building) but actually about hipocrisy, greed and feudal-like behaviour of land owners.

Rosemary, a local lady called, wrote this poem back in 1990 when she started to see the real changes happening in Storrington. She’d witnessed the mass development of the Horemare Estate in the early 1980s and it certainly didn’t stop there.

She’s now a pensioner and has lived here all her life. It’s never been published anywhere. She has kindly donated it to SPANGLE and has said she is happy for us to put it onto our website if we like it. She very much appreciates all that SPANGLE has done.

Goodbye goodbye to Storrington
for Storrington’s nearly gone
Choked by mindless building
let endlessly go on

Goodbye goodbye to the meadows
The Glebe where we use to play
and meandering brook at Cootham
Where have they gone today

We bade farewell to our village
a very long time ago
and now these freshened memories
even they must go

They say it’s the way to progress
for those content to see
bricks instead of beauty
Lost tranquility

But if this is the future
for the children of today
fighting for existence
immersed in bricks and clay

Remember green of childhood
replaced by soulless grey
The wealth we take for granted
squandered by life today

So leave us with our memories
of the world we used to know
That our children may inherit
the village we loved so.

Rosemary, Sept 1990, Storrington resident

Categories
Articles

Approved – A short term fix for a quick buck

Today, Horsham District Council’s Members followed its officers recommendation and voted to approve the revised development.

There was only 1 vote in objection but a further 4 also abstained (presumably, like us, concerned about the nature of the deal). SPANGLE supporters packed the room and made clear the strength of feeling against building housing on Storrington’s last historic Green Space.

There was disquiet in the Council Chamber but SPANGLE sensed that the “deal had been done behind closed doors” long before the vote. The Leader of the council produced a pre-written speech commending the application and the rest of the Members fell into line.

We believe it was a very sad moment for HDC’s planning, conservation, landscape and housing departments. Despite the depth of concern over the building on Green Space, the lack of site assessment, the opaque nature of the funding deal, the wholesale blind-siding of the emerging Neighbourhood Plan and the key objections from HDC’s own internal departments, the fight against losing the Glebe field was dealt a major blow.

We are disappointed that the Doctors’ case for a new surgery was used as the front for the housing component – which is, in effect, a kickback to the Diocese of Chichester to release the covenant it holds in its clutches over the doctors.

We still believe Storrington would be better served with a strategic healthcare plan with facilities close to or in the village centre – not this quick fix building on Green Space, accessed via the most polluted, congested and dangerous junction in the village. The Mill Stream site (owned by HDC) is still not occupied despite HDC’s claims that it was no longer available.

As our Parish Council also identified, the proposed 1,400sq m building will be – by the Doctor’s own calculations – at capacity by the time it opens in 2020. What happens then? More building on the Glebe? Probably.

A HOLLOW VICTORY?

On the positive side, our SaveTheGlebe campaign has had a significant impact on the application. We were instrumental in not only exposing some of the key myths (and dodgy deals) behind the scheme and, most importantly, adding pressure to get the scheme changed:

  • Housing reduced from 24 to just nine houses (albeit of the wrong type, and adjacent to listed properties and impacting heritage assets);
  • 60% of the Glebe field handed over to ‘public open space’ (but it’s not clear who will own, manage or protect this from future development);
  • And raised awareness of the Diocese of Chichester’s unwelcome and unjust control and influence over our village’s future healthcare.

NEXT STEPS

SPANGLE members will be meeting to consider its options. This fight has been lost but the battle may not be over.

Our only recourse now appears to be a Judicial Review* – a lengthy, costly and complicated process with an uncertain outcome.

We will report back in a few weeks once all the legal advice is in and the strength of an appeal assessed.

 

*If you can/wish to support a Judicial Review (either financially or in-kind with legal/admin support) please get in touch.

Categories
Articles

On balance… Conservation, Landscape and Housing objections are dismissed

It’s D-Day next week as the revised application goes before Horsham District Council’s full Planning Committee at 14.30 on Tuesday 21st March.

Bizarrely the scheme is recommended for approval in the final Committee Report (you can download a copy here). So, despite objections from the Council’s own Landscape, Housing and Conservation experts (and our own Parish Council’s unanimous objection) – along with clear statements that many aspects of the development are in clear contravention of HDC’s own planning policies – the report concludes “on balance” for approval.

Several of HDC’s officers appear to have caved into pressure (from where? on high?) and diluted their earlier objections – this is particularly evident in the Strategic Planning team which had issued an objection to the earlier scheme but – presumably after “the applicant’s negotiations with the council“– has done a complete U-turn.

SPANGLE will be speaking at the full Planning Committee next week to put across the key arguments against the housing development – and remind Councillors of the many ways it contradicts and is at odds with written Planning Policy.

If you want to see Storrington’s future healthcare provision developed in the right place and in the right way, join us at 14.30 on Tuesday 21st March at HDC’s officers to Save The Glebe for future generations.

Email us here if you need transportation.

Categories
Articles

A Strong Objection to a Cynical Attempt

Thank goodness for common sense! Our Parish Council met last week to review the ‘revised proposal’ and has issued an unequivocal response to Horsham District Council with regards to this speculative housing development: a STRONG OBJECTION.

The letter from the Parish Council to Chris Lyons, Director of Planning at HDC provides an accurate summation of all that is wrong with the application. In short, “the only thing that this application facilitates is profit for the diocese,” says the Parish Council consultation. And the application provides only a short term solution: “(it) does not provide a future-proof service to the community beyond 5 years and a longer-term solution to the provision of health care is required”.

Here are some other key extracts:

PCletter-230217“Whilst members fully support extended medical facilities, the Parish Council continues to register its STRONG OBJECTION to the above revised application on the following grounds:

Firstly, this Parish Council believes that with a 60% reduction in the number of houses proposed, this represents a more than significant change to the original application and that it should be considered as a new application and not an amendment.

That said, members do not consider that the reduction in the number of houses proposed has addressed any of our previous objections.

In addition, the type of houses proposed is not in line with the emerging Neighbourhood Plan, which requires a predominance of smaller houses, not larger ‘executive’ type houses. The Design and Access Statement incorrectly states that the proposal includes an element of affordable housing – it does not.

This proposal is now described as a ‘facilitating’ development, to provide the local community with a new doctors’ surgery through the delivery of new housing, housing that is neither needed nor of the size required, as indicated in the Parish’s Housing Needs Survey… There is therefore no overriding need for the houses proposed in this application. The proposal does not qualify as “enabling development” as there is no “significant building” to be protected.

It is also noted that the road to the south east of the proposed development has been left as a hammerhead, leaving access to the remainder of the site, presumably for further development at a later date. Should this application be approved, this would set a dangerous precedent for the remainder of the field.

In response to the previous application, HDC’s Strategic Planning Department said, on 23.9.2016: “The proposed housing is not enabling development for the medical centre as the medical centre would be financed by a grant from the NHS”. This has not changed. The only thing that this application facilitates is profit for the diocese. This is evidenced by the statement on page 35 of the D&A statement “…the Diocese have kindly offered to release the land required for the new doctors surgery for a nominal fee. However, this gesture is on the basis that new housing is to be delivered on site”. This is a cynical attempt by the diocese to obtain development that it has tried and failed to obtain in the past, by using the need for extended medical facilities to its own advantage. It is entirely possible for the diocese to sell a piece of land for a surgery without building houses.

The proposed location is a greenfield site, which is allocated as a Local Green Space in the emerging Storrington & Sullington and Washington Neighbourhood Plan.

The Parish Council considers that the traffic study provided with the application is inadequate and requests that WSCC Highways fully assess the implications of this proposal upon this already congested area.

The proposed new surgery does not provide a future-proof service to the community beyond 5 years and a longer-term solution to the provision of health care is required. The Planning Application does not make provision for further expansion to the medical centre and therefore the building could be rendered unsuitable for the needs of the community by 2020 and the threat to medical services in the community would return.

You can download the full letter by clicking on the image.

What’s next? Well, the public consultation has closed but we await the key internal consultations from HDC’s own Landscape, Conservation and Strategic Planning officials. All three departments objected to the initial scheme and we cannot see how they can view any of the changes in the revised application any differently. In fact, with the removal of the Affordable Housing, one could consider that (a) this revised scheme is effectively an entirely new application and (b) with no Affordable Housing, the revised application is even more contradictory to HDC Strategic Planning policy.

The application is scheduled for consideration by HDC’s full planning committee on Tuesday 21st March. Join us there!

Categories
Articles

Revised Scheme. Really?

Ding. Ding. Round 2! The applicant (Milwood Designer Home and Medical Centre Developments) has amended plans to reduce the number of homes from 24 to nine following negotiations with the council, reports West Sussex County Times.

Should we all cry: “Hooray! We’ve saved half the Glebe!” ?

No, we should not.

The revised scheme removes all Social Housing and proposes nine large “Millionaire Mansions” on half of the historic Glebe Field. The applicant promises ‘Green Open Space” on the remaining Glebe land but there is no indication of how this status is preserved. Will Diocese of Chichester set it up in Trust never to be built on? Or hand it over to the Parish for future generations? Unlikely. The church is behind this whole deal and continues to hold the village’s future healthcare to ransom over the land needed for the mega-surgery at the Glebe site.

And, the revised application appears to be  designed in such a way that the other half of the Glebe Field could be developed at a later date. Note the spur off the service road to the new surgery… This will allow for another batch of 5-bed houses on the remaining Glebe once the impact on Lady Place is knocked out of the way.

SPANGLE still maintains that:

Housing on the Glebe is not needed to deliver a new healthcare centre in Storrington. Healthcare centres are financially viable as standalone developments – and HDC knows this very well (after all, its developed and owns Steyning and Southwater’s health centres – with a good return to us ratepayers);

• Given that the Doctors sold the surgery in September (for a nifty £790,000) to a private sector health centre developer, they are now free of the Diocese’s restrictive covenant!

• Mill Stream is a better site for future healthcare provision in our village – central location, lots of parking, public transport access;

• The proposed new surgery at the Glebe will feed more traffic onto the village’s most polluted, most congested and most dangerous roundabout;

• Our Parish Council – and HDC’s own Conservation, Landscape and Strategic Planning departments – all shot down the original application (and should do the same with this revised proposal as it’s simply the same scheme split into two phases);

• The proposal is contrary to local and national planning policy due to its impacts on the landscape, townscape and heritage – and is entirely contrary to the democratic process behind the Neighbourhood Plan.

On what basis is Horsham District Council accepting this as a simple revision to the previous application (which itself was set for rejection)? The removal of Social Housing indicates that this is completely new scheme. We are asking HDC why it is not rejecting the revision and demanding the applicants withdraw and start again.

Please GET YOUR OBJECTIONS in now (before 22 February) to ensure we stop the Glebe Field being turned into a Millionaire’s private gated housing development.

Remember – the housing is NOT NEEDED to fund a new surgery for Storrington!

Categories
Articles

I must declare…

It’s interesting how speculative housing development schemes on designated Green Space come into being.

Storrington is being offered a shiny, new, all-singing medical centre – but in the wrong location. Why are we not redeveloping the Mill Stream site in the centre of the village with its extensive parking, safer access and public transport connections? A surgery at Mill Stream would also help drive visitors and their spending into the village’s shops, breathing life into the High Street.

Instead we are told to accept a surgery on the busiest, most dangerous and most polluted roundabout in the village. And to have this building, we have to accept housing all over the historic Glebe Field – adjacent to Listed properties, our churches and Storrington’s Conservation Area.

How has the future of Storrington’s healthcare provision ended up in the clutches of the Glebe landowner… the Diocese of Chichester?

The story begins – and potentially ends – with the sale of the former doctor’s surgery back in 1984… Here’s the only declaration we’ve seen on the matter (handed out quietly at the first public consultation back in May 2016). The sale came with a covenant on the use of the existing Glebe Surgery which the Diocese views as its Trump Card to getting housing where there shouldn’t be any…

GlebeSurgey-Whitehead-Interest

 

Categories
Articles

Dodgy deals?

West Sussex County Times today reports: “The applicant, Milwood Designer Home and Medical Centre Developments (MDC), have amended plans to reduce the number of homes from 24 to nine following negotiations with the council.

Is this true? Surely not!

Many of our SPANGLE members have voiced their concerns over the past months (when it all went quiet) that a “dodgy deal” has been done between Horsham District Council, district councillors and the developers. A quick fix deal will make “this problem” go away. HDC could move on. Medical Centre Developers get to build their new facility, with rent guaranteed by the NHS. Certain councillors will no doubt get to bask in the glory of getting their name above the door of a new health centre. Dr Whitehead will get his kickback (see below) from the sale of the former bungalow surgery back in 1984. And the Diocese, which has been behind this entire scheme all along, gets its pound of flesh. In fact, it will most likely pick up a couple of million off the MDC and the housing developers.

However, such negotiations are unlawful if they lead to an informal agreement that the Council will support a specific revised application. Such agreements are not permitted under planning law as “each case must be judged on its merits”.

What was the nature of the ‘negotiations’ between the council and the applicant? The press article suggests that Horsham District Council is happy to view the revised scheme favourably.

Months on…

  • Our requests under the Freedom of Information Act on Horsham District Council to find out why Mill Stream has not (cannot?) be reopened have been stalled.
  • Our complaints to the NHS’ Clinical Commissioning Group to understand why our patient data and NHS branding is being used to promote private housing developments have gone unanswered.
  • Our demand for clarification for Dr Whitehead’s position on the CCG and potential conflicts of interest in this matter are still not resolved.

Why are the authorities stalling and hiding the truth from us? What discussions and deals have been done?

 

GlebeSurgey-Whitehead-Interest

Categories
Articles

Glebe Surgery: SOLD!

On 28th September 2016 our doctors quietly sold their (our?) Glebe Surgery site for the sum of £780,000 to a private medical centre developer – called Medical Centre Developments Ltd.

This deal was done after the current planning application was submitted but prior to its review by the local Parish Council (where it was unanimously opposed).

What deal is now emerging for the site and Storrington’s future healthcare provision? And what impact will be proposed on the historic green space of the Glebe Field?

Interestingly the restrictive covenant on the site (which means it can only be used as a Doctors Surgery) also transfered with the sale. So, the Diocese of Chichester still has some cards in the game…

title

SPANGLE fundamentally believes that the Mill Stream site – with its central location, large parking and less dangerous access – is both a better short- and long-term location for Storrington’s healthcare provision. We are still lobbying for all parties to consider Mill Stream (and to create a visionary, long term plan for Storrington’s healthcare provision).

And, after months of asking, we have still not received answers as to why it cannot be brought back into operation now – and form part of the future healthcare provision the village needs.

Categories
Articles

Your Glebe, Our Glebe for Hundreds of Years

With the generous support of local ‘star’ historian Joan Ham, we’re reproducing her insightful article (first published in the Three Heralds magazine) which outlines the historic importance of the Glebe Field to Storrington. As Joan writes: “It is our last peaceful bit of green which it would be a great pity to lose.”

THE CHURCH MEADOW

by Joan Ham

Lying between West Street and School Lane, and E-W between the Church Street houses and the old Storrington Common (now bounded by Monastery Lane) was a green meadow. This was shown on the old parish map of 1788 divided into several parts by hedges, the larger parts belonging to W.Goble. A smaller western part and a house, the property of T.Skinner and a house and narrow strip along today’s School Lane belonging to E. Slater. Next to this, Goble had another small plot and messuage, and between this and the churchyard was Batcock’s property. The West Street edge along the road was divided into plots with buildings shown on some of them. One of Goble’s fields extended right out to the street between two groups of houses. North of the church between Thomas Batcock’s property and Church Street, the Rev. Mr Copley had property with buildings and a coppice.

The tithe map of 1841, which, however, has everything squared off, even ponds, should be regarded as a tax document rather than a geographically accurate map as it’s purpose is to show properties liable for the tithe, payable to the incumbent. The Town Meadow as it was then known, shows the whole 10 acres 1r 5p without internal hedges as the property of the Rev. Henry Warren with a small area next to the churchyard as “Warren’s plot”, 1acre 3p.

Storrington’s commons, properly called manor wastes, belonged to the Lord of the Manor, and were not enclosed until 1851 and shows the Rev. Henry Warren still owning the 10a 1r 5p of the Town Meadow and the little 1a 3p near the churchyard, previously the property of Goble.

scan-004

In 1877 a poster was published “to the Surveyors of Storrington Sussex,” signed by the Rev. James Beck of Storrington, Clerk in Holy Orders, giving notice to the churchwardens to assemble the inhabitants in the Vestry, “to s_ubmit to them my wish to divert a certain footpath across a portion of a field called or known as “Dixon’s Field” …“. In accordance with this, the Rector, churchwardens and surveyors called a Vestry meeting for 22 February 1877 to consider the matter.

Two footpaths entered the field from West Street, one near the present Village Hall (not then built ) and the other about half-way along West Street, possibly the site of today’s Rectory road. They converged to a single path which then ran to the NW corner of the churchyard. The Rev. James Beck of Parham, where there was no rectory house, had bought a plot of land with a cottage called “the Bartons” on Church Street, north of the church and shown in the 1788 map as belonging to the Rev. Mr Copley. He had pulled down the old cottage and was building an imposing Victorian house with a carriage drive from Church Street and gardens backing on to “Dixon’s Field”. The proposed diversion would have moved the footpath away from his garden and would have squared off the western boundary neatly.

The Dixon for whom the fields was known was Dr Dixon who had established a pill-making enterprise in Batcock’s cottage next to the churchyard in School Lane. Elizabeth Batcock was the pill-maker, reputed to be still working at the age of 100, when a peal of bells was rung to celebrate her great age.

The churchyard was rapidly filling up, and more space was needed, so Batcock sold his cottage and plot of land to accommodate more burials. This is the part below the bank, west of the original churchyard, where interment of ashes takes place, and the pump marks the old cottage garden site. When even this enlargement began to fill up, another area of the church meadow was enclosed to the north.

The newest and third Rectory was built in 1934 on a part of the church meadow behind Mr Beck’s house. Rectory Road was laid for access from West Street, which took in more of the field, when a close of houses was built later on the eastern side of Rectory Road.

Mrs Ravenscroft owned property along West Street east of Rectory Road and a plot of land with £500 had been given some years before to build a village hall, but as the money was not sufficient for the purpose, the land lay vacant. In 1947 Mrs Ravenscroft took out a Tree Preservation Order on the row of limes and sycamores which bordered the field above the retaining wall.

A letter from the Church Commissioners dated 23 January 1953 stated:

“The land you described as “Church Meadow” is not owned by the Church Commisssioners but appears from the files at this office to form part of the glebe land belonging to the benefice of Storrington.
If this is so, then the land would vest in the incumbent of the benefice concerned, who has power to sell subject to certain consents.
This benefice, however, is at present vacant and any proposal to sell would rest with the Bishop…
The local authority has not yet written to this office about the acquisition of “Church Meadow” for housing.”

There was a strange position at the time, as the Rev. W.R. Bassett-Smith of Sullington and the Rev.W. Frostick of Storrington had both retired at the same time. The Bishop was patron of Sullington and Keble College of Storrington but they agreed to the plurality with alternate rights of appointment. The Queen had to sign an Order in Council, agreeing to this, but she was touring Australia and nothing could be done until her return, so the Rev. George Mackenzie was priest-in-charge of Storrington with a dispensation to live at the Rectory.

scan-003

The western side of the church meadow lost more of its space when the Glebe Surgery was built to replace the old bungalow in Amberley Road which had served the local doctors for some years and had become inadequate for the growing population of the village. Now, even that modern surgery is overwhelmed and needs enlarging or replacing.

The church meadow, shown on maps variously as “Mr Warren’s piece”, “Cartwright’s” or the name of the current curate, was used by the Rev. Arthur Faithfull as a hayfield where children were allowed to play. Other events were al fresco tea parties given to the children by local worthies such as Mrs King’s Jubilee Tea Party. During WWII children from the village school crossed the field to the Village Hall, keeping them safe away from road traffic where Mrs Waller, the headmaster’s wife had organised a canteen to give them hot dinners. Today it is a popular dog-walking route much enjoyed by people escaping the continuous roar of large vehicles and cars through the village.

It is our last peaceful bit of green which it would be a great pity to lose.

 

Reproduced with kind permission of the author/Three Heralds

Categories
Articles

Get Ready! Tuesday 20th December

Looks like Tuesday 20th December is D-Day: This is the date set for HDC’s Planning Committee meeting which will decide on the Glebe Surgery housing development application.

Once we have the full details and timings, we’ll post them here. Sharpen those pens and gargle those vocal chords as we will get the chance to present the case for preserving Storrington’s last historic Green Space to the full Planning Committee.

UPDATE (9 December 2016): The agenda for the planning meeting has been published (link here) and has confirmed our suspicions: the proposed Glebe Housing Development is not on the agenda. We will now write to HDC’s planning case officer to seek guidance. Given that the application is likely to be refused, will the applicants withdraw and resubmit a new application with fewer (or even no) houses on it?